By Carmi Levy
Give Microsoft credit for making the burgeoning tablet wars interesting again. Just when you thought Apple’s
iPad was going to run away with first prize – or every prize, for that
matter – the Redmond software giant pulls some slick-looking hardware
out of its labs and throws down the gauntlet. If it isn’t game on, it’s
mighty close.
Microsoft calls its wannabe-iPad
killer the Surface, and at first glance it’s an impressive slab of
technology that boasts the kind of refined industrial design that’s made
anything with a fruit on it the object of endless fanboy desire.
It includes an innovative cover,
similar to the iPad’s Smart Cover that protects the screen and adds,
quite unexpectedly, a built-in multi-touch keyboard on the inside. Open
it up and start hammering out War and Peace. Sure, you can buy a
third-party keyboard case for your iPad, but this is a cleaner solution
for users who want to use their tablets for more than watching videos
and surfing the web.
It sports a 10.6-inch, full-HD screen
– bigger than the iPad’s 9.7-inch panel – and unlike Apple’s sealed-in
device, includes USB and external display ports.
What does all this tech talk mean? The Surface is a seriously capable tablet that one-ups the iPad in a number of key areas.
Microsoft’s decision to leap
head-first into making its own hardware is a bold move designed to
sidestep its traditional model of licensing its software to hardware
partners. Microsoft’s new religion, which mimics Apple’s build-it-all
philosophy, means the software can be more tightly integrated into the
hardware, and Microsoft isn’t stuck living with its hardware partners’
decisions. That reality has hobbled Windows for the better part of two
decades, with PC builders often adding in layers of advertising-heavy,
value-deficient software that clutter the experience and frustrate
users.
By bypassing middlemen like HP,
Toshiba and Samsung – and risking their newly-competitive wrath in the
process – Microsoft calls all the shots, and lives and dies with the
results. It’s a risk worth taking given how crucial these devices and
the upcoming next-generation Windows launches are to the company’s
future.
As so often seems to be the case
with Microsoft, however, its sheer ambition and capability may have put
its aspirations in the hole before they have a chance to see the light
of day. First is its decision to split the line by selling two distinct
models. A commercially-focused Windows 8 tablet will run on familiar
Intel-based processors – the same basic architecture that’s been
powering PCs for decades – and will support Windows programs. Have a
copy of Word or Excel lying around? Congratulations, it now runs on a
tablet.
A consumer-oriented model, based on
the ARM processors that underpin today’s most popular tablets and
smartphones, is a bit of a different animal. It runs something called
Windows RT, and your old software won’t work on it.
Apple seems to sell its one line of
iPads just fine into both consumer and enterprise channels. The bring
your own device (BYOD) revolution where regular users buy personal
technology like tablets and smartphones on Sunday, then walk them into
the office on Monday and demand that IT hook them up, is rendering
traditional divisions between consumer and corporate devices moot.
Microsoft’s decision to separately target these two worlds only serves
to confuse buyers and frustrate developers.
Yes, developers. The folks who will
make or break the Surface before it hits its first retail shelf. Forcing
them to choose between traditional Windows development and untried,
untested Windows RT isn’t going to go over well. Programmers like
simple, and this isn’t simple. And if they hesitate to dive in and
create new apps for either platform, all the fantastic hardware in the
world won’t save Microsoft’s tablet fortunes.
There’s no question that Microsoft
needed to do something bold to leapfrog beyond its roots in the PC
world. Tablets are nibbling into the fringes of the traditional laptop
market – Microsoft’s bread and butter – and as part of a rollout
strategy for its next-generation Windows 8 operating system that
encompasses both traditional computers, tablets, and hybrids of the two,
the company couldn’t simply update the current version of Windows and
call it a day.
It’s offered up two compelling tablet
flavours to convince the market it’s playing to win. The question
remains whether it needs two flavours to begin with, and whether it’s
focused so intently on the hardware it’s forgotten that earlier versions
of Windows soared because a software company made it easy for
programmers to develop and sell more programs than any other platform
combined.
Until Microsoft simplifies its
schizophrenic offerings and gives developers a reason to make the leap,
its promising new hardware will remain just that: promising.
No comments:
Post a Comment