Last week Google published photos of some of its 900,000
servers as part of a larger presentation that explains how an email makes its
way across the Internet. The images (one shown above, another at the end of
this article) show rows of racks, fully packed with servers and bathed in the green
light of the LEDs on each server tray. So let’s take a closer look and see what
else these photos might be able to tell us about Google’s data center
environment:
Servers
Each rack in the photo is populated with 20 servers, typical
of 2U servers. Google designs its own servers, which include an on-board
battery in each tray, a configuration that allows it to save power by avoiding
the AC-to-DC conversions required with a centralized UPS and battery
banks. Google uses its most newest and most powerful servers in its search
service.
“We optimize our fleet by repurposing older servers for
services that don’t require the same processing power, such as Gmail or
Picasa,” Google says. This strategy has translated into huge savings in
Google’s hardware budget, allowing it to avoid buying up to 90,000
servers. For context, only a handful of companies admit to having more
than 90,000 servers.
Racks
An interesting wrinkle: the racks are on wheels. We’ve heard
lots about “rack-and-roll” deployments, in which servers arrive pre-packaged in
their racks and are rolled into place. Leaving the wheels on the racks allows
for mobility and ease of configuration, but raises other questions.
For example: how would this configuration perform during
earthquakes? Seismic isolation systems provide some leeway for rack movement
during temblors, but having them on wheels could make life interesting during a
major quake. It’s possible that these racks are either deployed at a Google
data center in an area where few earthquakes occur (such as the Carolinas or
Atlanta) or may not represent a full production environment.
Raised Floor
One of the photos shows rows of racks on either side of a
narrow corridor, with a row of perforated floor tiles. This is typical of a
design in which cold air enters the server area through a sub-floor plenum in
the “cold aisle”, with air pressure guiding the cool air up and through the
racks. As the air passes through the racks, it removes heat from the components
and exits through the back of the rack into the “hot aisle,” where it is then
routed to cooling equipment for recirculation.
But is this Google’s primary cooling design? What we’ve
heard in recent years is that Google data centers featured raised floors, but
used them primarily to house piping for water, rather than as a cool air
plenum. The water was used in a cooling system that features cooling units in
the hot aisle, which function much like rear-door heat exchangers, removing the
heat from the air and returning it back to the room at the supply air
temperature to prevent recirculation of hot exhaust air. The water used in the
heat exchanger then goes to a cooling tower and is recirculated. But the
reports we’ve heard don’t appear to align neatly with the configuration shown
in these latest photos.
For what it’s worth, Google has also sought to patent an
adjustable cooling piping system, including “air wands” that provide small
amounts of cold air to components within a server tray. The company has also
patented a design for a “server sandwich” in which two motherboards are
attached to either side of a liquid-cooled heat sink.
Mysteries Remain
The question remains: Is this Google’s production
environment, a computing lab or testbed? Google has always treated the details
of its data centers as proprietary, saying its expertise and innovation in its
data centers represents a competitive advantage. Given that, and the fact that
the company’s 2009 disclosures showcased older technology, it’s possible that
these photos may not represent the current state of Google’s production
environment.
Or perhaps the Story of Send marks the beginning of a shift,
in which Google discloses more of its current technology, as Facebook has done
with the Open Compute Project.
If not, we’ll continue to analyze and speculate until more
photos emerge. And yes, we’re still waiting for the photos of the moats filled
with sharks with friggin’ laser beams on their heads.
No comments:
Post a Comment